Hence, the Panel agreed one x x x Article [26(2)] can be erased x x x

Properly, Blog post 26(2) didn’t can be found in the initial sort of the household Password not as much as Executive Acquisition (EO) 209 that has been signed to your law at the same time Chairman Corazon Aquino into the July 6, 1987. Days later, or into the July 17, 1987, President Aquino given EO 227 and therefore provided, yet others, Article twenty six(2). Thus, when the Relatives Code eventually took effect on August step 3, 1988, Post twenty-six, within the totality, realize the following:

26. All of the marriages solemnized beyond your Philippines, according to the legislation in effect in the country where they certainly were solemnized, and you may legitimate around as such, will additionally be appropriate in this nation, except those individuals blocked less than Posts thirty-five(1), (4), (5) and (6), thirty six, 37 and you may 38.

Where a married relationship anywhere between a Filipino citizen and a foreigner was validly known and you can a divorce case was after that validly gotten abroad from the the brand new alien lover capacitating him or her to remarry, brand new Filipino partner shall also provide power to remarry around Philippine laws.

When you find yourself Post 26(2) try reinstated by executive fiat, it’s nonetheless obvious that true heart behind the latest provision stays specific from the Panel deliberations – Blog post twenty-six(2) had been designed so you can serve as an exception to this rule towards the nationality concept embodied within the Article fifteen of your own Civil Code, hence claims:

Justice Puno, yet not, commented that it’ll open new gates so you’re able to around invalidating the fresh new Philippine laws and regulations of the simple expedient from marrying a non-native, and that it could well be a supplementary cause of the new breakage of families, in which Justice Caguioa consented

fifteen. Laws and regulations per relatives rights and you can responsibilities, or even new updates, status and you can judge capability off individuals is actually joining on residents out of brand new Philippines, even in the event way of living abroad.


Brand new deliberations demonstrate that Article twenty-six(2) has the effect of (i) implementing separation decrees that are joining on the international nationals under its federal law; and you will (ii) recognizing the rest of the effectation of such overseas https://lovingwomen.org/fi/blog/kreikkalaiset-treffisivustot/ breakup decrees to their Filipino spouses who happen to be bound by brand new prohibition facing absolute separation beneath the Municipal Password.

To be sure, Article 26(2) had not been crafted to dilute the Philippines’ policy against absolute divorce. In fact, this perceived possible dilution is precisely what prompted the majority of the Committee members to vote for the deletion of Article 26(2) in the initial version of the Family Code found in EO 209. As the deliberations indicate, the exception provided in Article 26(2) is slim, and you can meant merely to target the newest unjust condition you to results whenever a foreign federal receives a splitting up decree facing an effective Filipino resident, leaving the second stuck inside a married relationship as opposed to a spouse, thus:

Fairness Caguioa informed me the aim of the brand new provision would be to legalize overseas divorces to the Filipino to ensure that in the case away from a beneficial Filipina, who was erican, just who consequently after safeguarded a separation and divorce, said Filipina could well be allowed to remarry. Fairness Puno and you will Court Doing it yourself remarked that this is not clear about supply [Article twenty-six(2)]. Legal Diy reported that, while doing so, it’s an absurdity to have good Filipina become married without a partner. (Emphasis offered)

From inside the Van Dorn, a situation ily Password, a western citizen looked for in order to compel their former Filipina wife to help you offer an accounting of its so-called conjugal company into the Manila. This new American citizen debated that he chose the authority to show in the continues of one’s debated company, as splitting up decree issued by the Las vegas District Courtroom dont be provided with perception regarding Philippines. Governing from the Western citizen, the latest Judge held that the divorce decree granted by the a Joined Claims judge is binding facing him once the a western resident. Once the a residual aftereffect of like separation and divorce, brand new Western resident no more got standing to help you sue while the partner of his previous Filipina partner. And that, within the Van Dorn, the Court stored: